|
|
HOME |
BIO |
SEMINARS |
MOMENTUM NEWSLETTER
| CONTACTWOMEN & INVESTING
Women investors: gathering your confidence It’s a
conundrum: Several major studies suggest that women are interested in
investing, make well-considered investment decisions and are largely
responsible for managing their family’s finances and balancing household
budgets. Yet more often than not, among couples, the man still handles the
investments, and women still feel less confident than men about making
investment decisions.
On its website (www.fiscalagents.com),
Fiscal Agents Financial Services Group, an Oakville, Ontario-based
full-service savings and investments centre, discusses a U.S. survey that
shows 62 per cent of women balance the couple’s cheque book and 58 per cent
pay the household bills — but just 15 per cent are solely responsible for
making investment decisions.
This seems unfortunate when compared to the results of another study by
researchers at the University of California. The study examined the
investment records of 35,000 households with accounts at local brokerage
houses throughout the 1990s. It found that men turned their portfolios over
more frequently than women did — and tended to have lower returns at the end
of the year than women.
According to Fiscal Agents, women want more detail than men about the
investments their advisors propose. “A poll conducted in the U.S. in the
late 1990s found that women spend 40 per cent more time researching a mutual
fund before they invest. What’s more, they tend to be less impulsive and
less inclined to act on a hot tip than men are.”
Yet — and here is the irony — the poll also found women to be less confident
in their investing abilities than men. “Only 56 per cent of women feel
confident about their investing abilities versus 64 per cent of men.”
Women need more savings
A second irony is that when you look at the numbers, women actually need to
be more confident — and more skilled — than men when it comes to investing.
Generally, women still earn less than men for work of similar scope and
value. They may also leave the workforce for a decade or longer while their
children are young, or for several years later in life to care for aging
parents. As a result, they may work less and have less disposable income to
contribute to RRSP’s. They may also end up entitled to less income from the
Canada or Quebec Pension Plan because they contribute less to it during the
course of their working lives. Some women spend their lives raising families
and don’t work at all.
Then, to top it all off, women are statistically likely to outlive men by
several years, so they actually need their retirement savings to last longer
than men’s.
Whether you’re married or single, divorced or widowed — starting your career
or approaching retirement — the time to get more involved in your
investments is now.
Here are some ways to become more knowledgeable:
-
Read books, websites and newspaper articles about
investing.
-
Attend free seminars and presentations offered by
banks and insurance companies.
-
Consider taking the Canadian Securities Course,
offered by the Canadian Securities Institute (www.csi.ca).
And of course, talk to me about ways to become more
informed and involved when it comes to your own investments.
Women investors: learning to take risks
When it comes to investing, there is a general rule of thumb: the greater
the risk, the greater the potential returns. Since risk can sometimes
produce deep valleys in between the peaks, the question is: How much
volatility can you stomach while you’re waiting to capitalize on those
returns?
Studies show that many women are more reluctant than men to take on the
level of risk required to produce investment returns sufficient to meet
their needs. According to a Toronto Stock Exchange study, just 39 per cent
of women surveyed said they were willing to take “some risk” for a chance to
realize greater returns. In comparison, 58 per cent of men would take some
risk.
Playing it safe, however, is not necessarily the best way to go. According
to Marc Lamontagne, a certified financial planner with Ryan Lamontagne Inc.
in Ottawa, women need to guard against certain factors such as inflation,
taxes and longer life spans grinding down their money’s purchasing power.
The average woman can expect to live to age 87 — six more years than the
average male. That longer life span, says Lamontagne, means you need to
include a growth component in your portfolio.
Aim higher
“While risk tolerance is a very individual thing, at the very least you
should aim for an after-tax return that will outpace inflation,” he says.
Taking some risk with the growth portion of your portfolio will increase
your long-term rate of return, even if that portion is just 25 per cent of
the overall portfolio, says Lamontagne. “Remember though, there is no such
thing as a free lunch. The larger the growth component of the portfolio, the
greater the year to year volatility.”
To illustrate this point, compare the theoretical results investors can
obtain by taking varying levels of risk. According to Lamontagne, if you had
invested from 1985 to 2004, here is what would have happened:
|
Percentage Holdings |
All GIC |
Conservative |
Balanced |
Growth |
Aggressive Growth |
|
Average 5 Year GIC |
100.00 % |
65.00 % |
50.00 % |
30.00 % |
10.00 % |
|
Average Canadian Equity Mutual Fund |
0.00 % |
10.00 % |
15.00 % |
20.00 % |
20.00 % |
|
Average U.S. Equity Mutual Fund |
0.00 % |
10.00 % |
15.00 % |
20.00 % |
30.00 % |
|
Average US Small Cap Equity Mutual Fund |
0.00 % |
5.00 % |
5.00 % |
10.00 % |
10.00 % |
|
Average Global Equity Mutual Fund |
0.00 % |
10.00 % |
15.00 % |
20.00 % |
30.00 % |
|
Rate of Return |
6.90% |
8.10% |
8.40% |
8.90% |
9.30% |
*Source:
Morningstar Canada Average Mutual Fund Returns. |
So what would have happened if you had invested $10,000 in 1985?
-
If you’d gone the all-GIC route, you would have
accumulated $37,980.
-
Opting for just a little risk in a conservative
portfolio, you would have gathered $47,480.
-
Taking a little more risk and choosing a balanced
portfolio, your investments would have turned into $50,186.
-
Turning the risk dial up all the way and investing
in an aggressive growth portfolio, your $10,000 would have grown to
$59,211.
Of course, investing larger sums of cash more regularly — as most investors
do over a 10-year time frame — would amplify these discrepancies
considerably.
A little education can go a long way when it comes to investing, so read up:
Armed with knowledge, you may find yourself becoming comfortable enough with
risk to more than meet your goals. Talk to me about ways to learn more.
© Copyright of this
article is held by The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (Manulife
Financial). You are free to make copies of this article and to distribute
it, either in paper form or electronically, as long as you do not change or
remove any part of this work. All other uses are prohibited.
Manulife Investments is the brand name identifying the personal wealth
management lines of business offered by Manulife Financial and its
subsidiaries in Canada. As one of Canada’s largest integrated financial
services providers, Manulife Investments offers a variety of products and
services including segregated funds, mutual funds, principal protected
notes, annuities and guaranteed interest contracts. |